Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max 评测 - M4 Max 是最快的移动处理器之一冷却达到极限 Apple 新款 M4 Max 的顶级配置增加了两个性能核心和速度极快的显卡。然而，MacBook Pro 16 的散热却拖了 M4 Max 的后腿，使其无法充分发挥潜力。是时候采用新的机箱设计了吗？Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 12/12/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 ARM Apple Laptop / Notebook MacBook Thunderbolt
结论 -Apple M4 Max扩大了其在性能方面的领先优势随着新一代 M4 的发布，Apple 进一步扩大了其在性能上的领先优势。它的单核性能无与伦比，高端版本的 M4 Max 在多核负载下是市场上速度最快的移动处理器之一，此外，它还能保持超级稳定（即使在电池模式下）。另一方面，它的图形性能可以做得更好，在大多数情况下，与采用专用GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU 的竞争对手不相上下，在某些情况下，它甚至击败了 4080 笔记本电脑的低版本。
不过，在 CPU/GPU 同时负载的情况下，MacBook Pro 16 的散热显然限制了 M4 Max 的性能，事实上，该芯片的功耗甚至略低于 M4 Pro。在这种情况下，电源也是一个限制因素，尤其是快速的 Max 配置，可以从更强的散热性能中获益。如果以配备 M4 Pro 的 14 英寸机型为参照，14 英寸机型在这方面可能更弱。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
除此之外，M4 Pro 型号的优缺点也同样适用于该版本。这些优点包括高质量的外壳、丰富的功能、亮度更高的绚丽迷你 LED 面板和可选的磨砂表面、出色的音响系统和超长的电池续航时间。缺点是缺乏升级/维护选项，以及增加内存/SSD 容量需要支付巨额附加费（Apple ）。
Pros+ 优质稳定的外壳色彩准确的亮丽显示屏/可选哑光显示屏
+ 色彩准确的亮丽显示屏/可选哑光显示屏
+ 极高的 hdr 亮度/改进的 sdr 亮度
+ 日常使用时几乎总是非常安静极高的
+ 极高的系统性能
+ M4 Max 性能大幅提升
+ 超长电池续航时间
+ 出色的扬声器高达
+ 高达 128 GB 内存和 8 TB SSD 存储空间
+ 具有高级功能的 12 百万像素网络摄像头Cons- 在 cpu/gpu 综合负载下性能有限
- 持续的 pwm 闪烁和缓慢的响应时间
- 保修期仅为 12 个月
- 几乎没有维护选项
- 内存和固态硬盘存储费用极高
- 网络摄像头没有 FaceID，拍摄照片/视频时分辨率仍然很低
- 无 Wi-Fi 7
价格和供应情况MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max 配置 36GB 内存和 1TB SSD，目前在亚马逊上的售价为 3,209 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay
1.91.7%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max (16 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘48 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $3,562.84Apple 2024 MacBook Pro Lapto...2. $5,679.00Apple 2024 MacBook Pro Lapto...3. $2,884.00Apple 2024 MacBook Pro Lapto...List Price: 4699€2.1 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234254 PPIMini-LED
2.93.2% v7 (old)Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core ⎘ Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘128 GB Memory, 8192 GB SSDAmazon: $3,099.00List Price: 8529€2.1 kg16.9 mm16.00"3456x2234257 PPIMini-LED
3.84.2%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU ⎘64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 4300 USD1.8 kg19 mm16.00"3840x2400283 PPIIPS
4.83.5%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: $2,299.00List Price: 3239 Euro2 kg20.5 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS LED
5.87.8%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,749.99ASUS ProArt PX13 (Replace P1...2. $65.88GERVGHS 200W Laptop Charger ...3. $109.99ROG 200W Charger for Asus Pr...List Price: 4000€1.8 kg17.3 mm16.00"3840x2400283 PPIOLED
6.81.2%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $145.0016.0" WQXGA 2560(RGB)×1600 ...2. $155.00Replacement Screen 16.0" for...3. $137.0016.0" for Schenker XMG Pro 1...List Price: 2300 Euro2.3 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS
7.88.7% v7 (old)Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $49.91Original New for Lenovo Yoga...2. $2,059.99Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt...3. $49.91Original New for Lenovo Yoga...List Price: 2700€2.1 kg18.3 mm16.00"3200x2000236 PPIMini-LED
8.88.6% v7 (old)Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,729.99Dell XPS 9640 Laptop (2024) ...2. $3,088.00Dell XPS 16 9640 16.3" Touch...3. $1,769.00Dell XPS 9640 Laptop (2024) ...2.3 kg18.7 mm16.30"3840x2400139 PPIOLED
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Table of Contents结论 -Apple M4 Max扩大了其在性能方面的领先优势规格与 MacBook Pro 16 M4 Pro 的区别性能 - 最高 128GB 内存的 M4 Max排放与动力压力测试Notebookcheck 总评分
MacBook Pro 16 2024 要么配备了完整版的全新 M4 Pro SoC（如本详细评测所示），要么配备了功能更强大的 M4 Max SoC 的两个变体。"小 "版 M4 Max 配备 14 个 CPU 内核，CPU 性能与 M4 Pro 相同，但 GPU 性能更强，配备 32 个内核，售价为 3,499 美元起。配备 16 个 CPU 内核和 40 个 GPU 内核的完整版 M4 Max 起价 3999 美元，我们今天测试的正是配备 48 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 的这一版本。如果您选择 128 GB 内存（+1000 美元）、8 TB 固态硬盘（+2200 美元）和磨砂面板（+150 美元），价格将上涨到 7349 美元。
由于其外壳、连接、输入设备、显示屏或扬声器与我们已经测试过的 我们已经测试过的 M4 Pro 型号因此，我们在此不再赘述这些部分，而是将重点放在全新 M4 Max 处理器的性能上。
规格
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max (MacBook Pro 16 2024 Series)ProcessorApple M4 Max (16 cores) 16 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, 57 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / SustainedGraphics adapterApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, 75 W TDPMemory48 GB , LPDDR5X-8533, onboardDisplay16.20 inch 16:10, 3456 x 2234 pixel 254 PPI, Mini-LED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorageApple SSD AP1024Z, 1024 GB , 962 GB freeConnections3 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 3 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo , Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 16.8 x 355.7 x 248.1Battery99.6 Wh, 8607 mAh Lithium-IonOperating SystemApple macOS 15 SequoiaCameraWebcam: 12 MP Center StagePrimary Camera: 12 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 6-speaker system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 140W PSU, 12 Months WarrantyWeight2.149 kg, Power Supply: 349 g
Price4699 EuroLinksApple homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
与 MacBook Pro 16 M4 Pro 的区别2024 MacBook Pro 的 16 英寸版本有 M4 Pro SoC 和 M4 Max SoC 两种，所有版本的外壳和功能都非常相似。这包括所有 USB-C 端口都支持 Thunderbolt 5（最高 120 GBit/s），以及由两个风扇组成的冷却装置；只有散热器本身略有不同。另一方面，M4 Max 可以控制两台额外的外接显示器，即除内置屏幕外，最多可同时控制四台外接显示器。
最大 MBP 16 M4MBP 16 M4 Pro
尺寸比较
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Dell XPS 16 9640 HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI DIN A4 ❌
可持续性Apple 在 产品页面上提供了 MacBook Pro 16 的环境报告https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/specs/.设备本身及其包装均使用了大量可回收材料。我们测试配置的二氧化碳排放量为 303 千克。
性能 - 最高 128GB 内存的 M4 Max在 MacBook Pro 16 内部，顶级版本的全新 M4 Max 最多可配置 128GB 内存，这几乎是所有同类设备的一大优势。此外，由于是统一内存，GPU 也能从中充分受益。不过，随着新的 Strix Halo APU 的发布，在这方面很快就会出现直接的竞争对手。根据传言，它将提供高达 96 GB 的内存。
测试条件MacBook Pro 16 具有三种电源模式：低电量模式、自动 模式和高性能模式。默认情况下，MacBook 使用自动模式，我们也使用该模式进行以下基准测试和测量。在我们的测试中，高性能模式并不总是具有优势，但我们将在个别章节中对此进行更深入的探讨。
处理器 - 配备 16 个内核的 M4 MaxApple 与老一代 M3 芯片相比，新的 M4 芯片再次改变了其 CPU 战略。虽然 M3 Max CPU 的速度明显快于 M3 Pro，但完整版的 M4 Pro和小型 M4 Max 现在不相上下，因为两者都有 14 个 CPU 内核（10 倍性能，4 倍效率），时钟频率相同。只有顶级型号的 M4 Max 配备了两个额外的性能内核，当然这也反映在其功耗上。M4 Pro 在多核满载情况下的最大功耗为 46 瓦，而 M4 Max 现在的功耗高达 57 瓦，尽管在我们的测试过程中这一数值仅短暂达到，随后便趋于平稳，约为 50 瓦。在 "高性能"模式下，我们注意到耗电量为 57-59 瓦，而且这一数值始终保持不变，这就是为什么在 CB 2024 中其多核性能略胜一筹的原因。
其多核性能令人印象深刻。在原生 Cinebench 2024 和 Geekbench 测试中，它比老款 M3 Max 的优势为 17-21%，甚至比完整版的 M4 Pro 也高出 14-17%。在 Cinebench 2024 测试中，它甚至是有史以来速度最快的移动处理器之一，仅次于 XMG Neo 16 的超频版酷睿 i9-14900HX。 XMG Neo 16的酷睿 i9-14900HX 才稍快一些。新的 M4 Max 也只比 酷睿 i9-14900HX和 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D在 Blender CPU 测试中也仅次于酷睿 i9-14900HX 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
2071 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z (High Performance)
2069 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
2015 Points -3%Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053XNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1772 Points -14%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
1729 Points -16%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
1612 Points -22%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1393 Points -33%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1201 Points -42%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1001 Points -52%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
999 Points -52%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
989 Points -52%Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
178 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
178 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
139 Points -22%SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
122.6 Points -31%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
118.8 Points -33%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
116 Points -35%Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053XNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
115 Points -35%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
108.2 Points -39%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
104 Points -42%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
101.6 Points -43%Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
25760 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
22509 Points -13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
21243 Points -18%SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
19665 Points -24%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6.2.1)
17086 Points -34%Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053XNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
16957 Points -34%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (6.2.1)
15367 Points -40%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (6.2.1)
14031 Points -46%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (6.2.1)
14002 Points -46%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (6.2.1)
13656 Points -47%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 (6.2.1)
12952 Points -50%Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
3880 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
3836 Points -1%SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
3109 Points -20%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
3096 Points -20%Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053XNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2916 Points -25%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (6.2.1)
2877 Points -26%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6.2.1)
2764 Points -29%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (6.2.1)
2570 Points -34%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (6.2.1)
2495 Points -36%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (6.2.1)
2418 Points -38%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 (6.2.1)
2389 Points -38%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (3.3.3)
312 Seconds * -87%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (3.3.3)
306 Seconds * -83%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 (3.3.3)
297 Seconds * -78%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (3.3.3)
285 Seconds * -71%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3.3.3)
233 Seconds * -40%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (3.3.3)
214 Seconds * -28%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
194 Seconds * -16%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
167 Seconds * SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost, Oasis)
155 Seconds * +7%Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053XNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (3.3.3)
150 Seconds * +10%* ... smaller is better
无论如何，新款 M4 SoC 的单核性能毋庸置疑，Apple ，进一步扩大了在竞争中的领先优势。旧款 M3 Max 的性能超出了高达 25-28%，其他竞争对手在这种情况下根本没有机会。不过，它在单核测试中的功耗略高于 M4 Pro，为 6.2-6.5 瓦。
在 Cinebench 2024 多重压力测试（30 分钟）中，M4 Max 使用两种能耗曲线都轻松通过了测试，而且性能完全保持不变。在旧的 Cinebench R15 Multi 循环测试中，自动模式下的性能波动很小，但这只是因为测试时间很短（几秒钟）。因此，57 瓦的短暂上限和降至 50 瓦在这里也有影响。不过，我们所讨论的仍然只是降低了约 3-4%。
在电池模式下，其性能保持稳定，直到电池电量达到 4%。只有从这一点开始，我们才注意到性能的显著下降。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores): Ø3647 (3596.15-3782.15) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core: Ø3354 (3260.25-3391.27) HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2646 (2585.98-2853.07) Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2743 (2699.24-2880.39) Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3476 (3466.5-3497.73) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3394 (3129.4-4350.66) Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2931 (2869.44-3004.58) Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2707 (2643.06-2817.5)
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit3647 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit175.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.5 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit307 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)563 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)6995 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core27595 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core2209 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core178 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core2069 Points
Help... in comparison
系统性能在跨系统 CrossMark 基准测试中，MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max 明显领先于直接竞争对手，这种领先优势在浏览器测试中也很明显。它的主观性能也非常高，尽管竞争对手也是如此。在测试过程中，我们也没有发现稳定性方面的问题。其内存速度明显高于 M3 Max，但与 M4 Pro 相比差别不大。
非晶内存 Mark M4 Max
非晶内存 Mark M4 Pro
非晶内存 Mark M3 Max
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
2255 Points Average Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
2255 Points 0%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2067 Points -8%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
2051 Points -9%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1848 Points -18%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1794 Points -20%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1770 Points -22%Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=65, last 2 years)
1746 Points -23%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1719 Points -24%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1708 Points -24%CrossMark / Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
2042 Points Average Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
2042 Points 0%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1911 Points -6%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
1828 Points -10%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1750 Points -14%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1686 Points -17%Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=65, last 2 years)
1651 Points -19%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1630 Points -20%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1611 Points -21%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1611 Points -21%CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
2795 Points Average Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
2795 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
2564 Points -8%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2371 Points -15%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2270 Points -19%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2014 Points -28%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1993 Points -29%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1981 Points -29%Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=65, last 2 years)
1975 Points -29%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1903 Points -32%CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1734 Points +9%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1683 Points +6%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
1595 Points Average Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
1595 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
1486 Points -7%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points -9%Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=65, last 2 years)
1439 Points -10%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1418 Points -11%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1338 Points -16%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1225 Points -23%WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
543 Points Average Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
543 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
426 Points -22%Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=67, last 2 years)
326 Points -40%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
319 Points -41%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
298 Points -45%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
295 Points -46%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
295 Points -46%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
285 Points -48%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
283 Points -48%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
353 Points Average Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
353 Points 0%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points -15%Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 353, n=60, last 2 years)
274 Points -22%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
268 Points -24%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
261 Points -26%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
258 Points -27%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
254 Points -28%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
244 Points -31%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
528 ms * -106%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
515 ms * -101%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
494 ms * -93%Average of class Multimedia (254 - 835, n=72, last 2 years)
482 ms * -88%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
461 ms * -80%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
439 ms * -71%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
391.7 ms * -53%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
256.2 ms * Average Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
256 ms * -0%* ... smaller is better
存储设备非晶盘标记尽管我们的测试配置价格不菲，但它只安装了一个无法更换或升级的 1 TB SSD。开箱即可使用的容量为 962 GB，PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的传输速率非常高。MBP 16 最多可配备 8 TB 固态硬盘，但售价为 2200 美元，Apple ，价格不菲。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test: 5GB Read | 5GB Write Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
5401.3 MB/s +7%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
5294.2 MB/s +5%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple SSD AP1024Z
5175 MB/s +2%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple SSD AP1024Z
5060.9 MB/s Average of class Multimedia (2877 - 5666, n=10, last 2 years)
4728 MB/s -7%Average Apple SSD AP1024Z (2797 - 5175, n=8)
3667 MB/s -28%Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
6713.2 MB/s +8%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
6699 MB/s +7%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple SSD AP1024Z
6431 MB/s +3%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple SSD AP1024Z
6242.8 MB/s Average of class Multimedia (2993 - 8271, n=10, last 2 years)
5548 MB/s -11%Average Apple SSD AP1024Z (2873 - 6431, n=8)
4218 MB/s -32%
图形卡 - 配备 40 个 GPU 内核的 M4 Max快速 M4 Max SoC 配备了 40 核 GPU，是Apple 目前的顶级型号。我们能从 GPU 中获得最大 75 瓦的功耗，但在许多测试中，我们注意到最大功耗为 60 瓦。在这种情况下，Turbo 模式对功耗没有直接影响，但我们仍能在 Cinebench 2024 GPU 测试中取得更好的成绩（+4.7%）。GPU 可以访问整个 RAM。
根据不同的基准测试，它比旧版 M3 Max GPU 的优势为 14-27%，在跨系统测试中，它的成绩一般略好于 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的直接竞争对手，如 华硕 ProArt P16.在 GFX-Bench 测试和 CB-2024 GPU 测试中，速度更慢的 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑也被击败。在使用 Metal 进行的 Blender 测试中，M4 Max SoC 用时约 18 秒，与 Nvidia 专用 GPU（OPTIX 或 CUDA）不相上下。无论是在电池模式下还是在连续负载情况下，GPU 的性能都保持稳定。
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Score | Wild Life Extreme Unlimited Geekbench 6.4: GPU Metal | GPU OpenCL GFXBench: 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen Cinebench 2024: GPU Blender: v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (DX12)
17178 Points +23%Razer Blade 16 Early 2023NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (Vulkan)
16652 Points +19%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
13989 Points Average Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
13989 Points 0%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
12189 Points -13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
7781 Points -44%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
6739 Points -52%Average of class Multimedia (1147 - 13989, n=32, last 2 years)
5604 Points -60%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
37434 Points Average Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
37434 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
31268 Points -16%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
22868 Points -39%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22556 Points -40%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
19345 Points -48%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17684 Points -53%Average of class Multimedia (3164 - 37434, n=28, last 2 years)
14210 Points -62%Geekbench 6.4 / GPU Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
179746 Points Average Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
179746 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
155752 Points -13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
114278 Points -36%Average of class Multimedia (47494 - 179746, n=10, last 2 years)
106862 Points -41%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
99055 Points -45%Geekbench 6.4 / GPU OpenCL
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (6.4.0 Pro)
175192 Points +50%Razer Blade 16 Early 2023NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (6.3)
167386 Points +44%Asus Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005WNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H
175141 Points +50%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUSNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13800H (6.2.1)
148707 Points +28%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
117097 Points +1%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
116455 Points Average Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
116455 Points 0%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
112310 Points -4%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6.2.1)
111325 Points -4%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
105731 Points -9%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
96607 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
93132 Points -20%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
91413 Points -22%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
69778 Points -40%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
60506 Points -48%Average of class Multimedia (9994 - 125058, n=70, last 2 years)
52258 Points -55%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
232 fps 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
231.7 fps Razer Blade 16 Early 2023NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
212 fps -9%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
203.7 fps -12%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
197.2 fps -15%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
125.8 fps -46%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
123.9 fps -47%Average of class Multimedia (36.4 - 232, n=17, last 2 years)
105.9 fps -54%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
103.3 fps -55%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
96.5622 fps -58%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
516 fps 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
515.8 fps Razer Blade 16 Early 2023NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
485 fps -6%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
446.1 fps -14%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
446 fps -14%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
283.7 fps -45%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
282.3 fps -45%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
234.5 fps -55%Average of class Multimedia (73.3 - 516, n=17, last 2 years)
230 fps -55%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
224.363 fps -57%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Average Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
941 fps 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
940.8 fps Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
573.2 fps -39%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
564 fps -40%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
525.655 fps -44%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
501.5 fps -47%Average of class Multimedia (174.6 - 941, n=14, last 2 years)
484 fps -49%Cinebench 2024 / GPU
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
18134 Points +10%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores) (High Performance)
16546 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
15804 Points -4%Average Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (15804 - 16546, n=2)
16175 Points -2%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUSNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13800H
15143 Points -8%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
13214 Points -20%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11062 Points -33%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10457 Points -37%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9916 Points -40%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
9551 Points -42%Average of class Multimedia (3289 - 16546, n=18, last 2 years)
9170 Points -45%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
8851 Points -47%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
7768 Points -53%Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 121, n=7, last 2 years)
56.3 Seconds * -216%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) (3.3.21)
52 Seconds * -192%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
32 Seconds * -80%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
17.8 Seconds * Average Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU (n=1)
17.8 Seconds * -0%Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=27, last 2 years)
42 Seconds * Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
24 Seconds * SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
21 Seconds * Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
19 Seconds * Asus Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005WNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H (3.3.3)
18 Seconds * Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUSNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13800H (3.3.3)
16 Seconds * Razer Blade 16 Early 2023NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
15 Seconds * Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
15 Seconds * Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 164, n=26, last 2 years)
66.7 Seconds * Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
42 Seconds * HP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
40 Seconds * Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
36 Seconds * SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
34 Seconds * Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (3.3.3)
34 Seconds * Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
32 Seconds * Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUSNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13800H (3.3.3)
27 Seconds * Asus Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005WNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H (3.3.3)
24 Seconds * Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * Razer Blade 16 Early 2023NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * 3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Score | Wild Life Extreme Unlimited Geekbench 6.4: GPU Metal | GPU OpenCL GFXBench: 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen Cinebench 2024: GPU Blender: v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA * ... smaller is better
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
13989 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
14212 pointsHelp
由于适用于 macOS 的原生游戏数量有限，因此仍难以评估其游戏性能。目前，我们只能用《博德之门 3》来比较它与 Windows 笔记本电脑的性能。在 1080p 和最大细节条件下，M4 Max GPU 与竞争对手之间的差距是 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑.不过，我们测试的其他游戏必须进行模拟，这反过来又使笔记本电脑的性能限制变得非常明显。赛博朋克 2077》这款游戏将于明年在 macOS 上原生发布，我们很有兴趣尝试一下。
Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Total War Pharaoh | The Witcher 3 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.7 fps +19%SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.8 (87.2min, 87.8P0.1, 95.1P1 - 167.6max) fps +13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
99 fps HP ZBook Studio 16 G11Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
96.7 fps -2%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.8 fps -7%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 fps -17%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67.4 (49min, 50.5P0.1, 58.5P1 - 123.1max) fps -32%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
62 fps -37%Average of class Multimedia (7.8 - 127.3, n=54, last 2 years)
46 fps -54%Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 (68.4min - 105.2max) fps +74%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.7 (65.3min - 103.5max) fps +70%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.9 (18min - 118.1max) fps +62%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65.1 (53.5min - 83.5max) fps +37%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64.3 (53.3min - 83.8max) fps +36%HP ZBook Studio 16 G11Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
64.3 (51.9min - 83.5max) fps +36%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
47.4 fps Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
42.8 fps -10%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
39.6 fps -16%Average of class Multimedia (6.41 - 97.8, n=65, last 2 years)
35.8 fps -24%Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
121 fps +116%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
56 fps Average of class Multimedia (23.4 - 121, n=17, last 2 years)
55.5 fps -1%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
51.2 fps -9%The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121 fps +13%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.8 (103min, 103P1 - 114max) fps +1%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
107 fps Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 (77min, 83P1 - 95max) fps -18%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
69 fps -36%Average of class Multimedia (11 - 121, n=42, last 2 years)
49.2 fps -54%Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
129 fps Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
122 fps -5%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
87 fps -33%Average of class Multimedia (23 - 129, n=12, last 2 years)
78.1 fps -39%
lowmed.highultraQHD4KThe Witcher 3 (2015)
157
107
78
61
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
167
143
129
94
51
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)
164
131
101
99
69
35
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)
49.1
48.7
48.5
47.4
43
21.3
Total War Pharaoh (2023)
74.1
61.8
56.1
56
56
50
排放与动力噪音排放它的散热与我们已经测试过的 M4 Pro 几乎没有区别。在空转和执行简单任务时，MacBook 通常保持完全安静，或者只能听到非常低频的噪音。不过，在自动模式下，M4 Max 的最大音量为 42.2 dB(A)，只要设备负载稍大，音量就会更快达到。在高性能 模式下，风扇转速的波动明显比 M4 Pro 型号.在压力测试中，我们测得最大噪音为 54.7 dB(A)，运行《博德之门 3》时为 50.2 dB(A)。在某些 GPU 基准测试中，我们可以听到一些轻微的线圈呼呼声。
Noise Level
Idle
24.1 / 24.1 / 24.1 dB(A)Load
42.2 / 42.2 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.1 dB(A)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024ZApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192ZHP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TBLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115NDell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02Noise2%-5%-9%-15%-24%-9%-5%off / environment *24.123.7 2%23.8 1%24.7 -2%24.4 -1%25 -4%24.3 -1%24.5 -2%Idle Minimum *24.123.7 2%23.8 1%24.7 -2%24.4 -1%28 -16%24.3 -1%24.5 -2%Idle Average *24.123.7 2%26.4 -10%24.7 -2%27.7 -15%31 -29%24.3 -1%24.5 -2%Idle Maximum *24.123.7 2%26.4 -10%24.7 -2%32.3 -34%35 -45%25.8 -7%27.5 -14%Load Average *42.240.8 3%33.7 20%43.7 -4%42.2 -0%52 -23%48.1 -14%39.6 6%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *42.246.1 -9%53.2 -26%53.2 -26%53 -26%Load Maximum *42.242.8 -1%53.2 -26%53.3 -26%53.2 -26%52 -23%53.9 -28%49.7 -18%Witcher 3 ultra *42.849.749.7* ... smaller is better
温度Apple MacBook Pro 16 的表面温度控制得非常好。即使在游戏或压力测试中，我们测得的最高温度也不到 43 °C。这意味着将该设备放在大腿上也不会有任何问题。键盘区域的发热也很明显，可能会导致手指发热，但在这方面没有任何限制。
Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
42.4 °C42.7 °C42.3 °C 39.6 °C42.8 °C39.3 °C 30.8 °C29.3 °C30.5 °C
Maximum: 42.8 °CAverage: 37.7 °C
42.3 °C42 °C42.2 °C40.7 °C41.7 °C39.8 °C31.1 °C33 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 42.3 °CAverage: 38.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 46.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
23.3 °C23.6 °C23.2 °C 23.1 °C23.3 °C23.1 °C 23.2 °C23 °C22.9 °C
Maximum: 23.6 °CAverage: 23.2 °C
23.3 °C23.3 °C23.3 °C23.2 °C23.5 °C23.3 °C23.2 °C23.5 °C23.2 °C
Maximum: 23.5 °CAverage: 23.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 34.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
42.6 °C42.5 °C41.7 °C 37.7 °C42.4 °C39.1 °C 30.1 °C28.8 °C29.8 °C
Maximum: 42.6 °CAverage: 37.2 °C
42.9 °C42.8 °C42.5 °C39.8 °C41.2 °C39.3 °C31 °C32.8 °C32 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °CAverage: 38.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 46.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-2.1 °C / -3.7 F).
表面温度应力测试（顶部）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPUApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUHP ZBook Studio 16 G11Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPULenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPUAsus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPULenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUDell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUHeat3%-21%-11%-20%-47%-8%-4%Maximum Upper Side *42.842.3 1%36.6 14%50.3 -18%46.9 -10%51 -19%41.7 3%39.4 8%Maximum Bottom *42.342 1%47.8 -13%38 10%50.9 -20%66 -56%46.3 -9%36.9 13%Idle Upper Side *23.622.5 5%31.4 -33%28.3 -20%28.9 -22%35 -48%26.2 -11%28.2 -19%Idle Bottom *23.522.9 3%35.6 -51%27.3 -16%30 -28%39 -66%27.2 -16%27.4 -17%* ... smaller is better
压力测试压力测试显示，M4 Max 测试设备的表现与 M4 Pro 变体略有不同，这让我们有些吃惊。此外，高性能模式在这里也没有明显的影响。在每种情况下，CPU/GPU 的消耗都在 28 瓦左右，即总共只有 56 瓦左右。M4 Pro 在自动模式下的功耗约为 60 瓦，在高性能模式下甚至达到了 66 瓦。在综合负载下，MacBook Pro 16 的散热装置根本无法发挥全新 M4 Max 的性能潜力。
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power; High Performance: Ø29.3 (21.739-47.927) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø27.2 (20.235-52.238) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power; High Performance: Ø28 (21.523-39.099) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø27.2 (8.809-36.669)
耗电量在使用 M4 Max 时，MacBook Pro 16 的功耗受到 140 瓦电源的限制，负载非常高，但这只是在很短的时间内，而且没有从电池中获取电能。我们测得的最大功耗约为 144 瓦，之后功耗迅速下降，仅为 120 瓦左右。在游戏时，我们测得的功率约为 116 瓦，比 M4 Pro 配置高出约 30 瓦。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.23 / 0.42 WattIdle 4.7 / 15.5 / 15.6 Watt
Load
125 / 143.7 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024ZApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192ZApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048ZHP ZBook Studio 16 G11NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TBLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115NDell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02Power Consumption-1%12%-43%-6%-14%-153%-41%9%Idle Minimum *4.75.2 -11%4.6 2%14 -198%7.3 -55%8 -70%31 -560%10.3 -119%7.7 -64%Idle Average *15.516.9 -9%16.8 -8%22.4 -45%12.3 21%9.9 36%33 -113%21.9 -41%10.3 34%Idle Maximum *15.617.2 -10%17.1 -10%25.7 -65%17.9 -15%11.6 26%41 -163%22.4 -44%10.6 32%Load Average *12590.5 28%76.4 39%90.2 28%78.2 37%76.9 38%114 9%96.9 22%76.5 39%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *116.283.4 28%125.4 -8%123.5 -6%157.7 -36%218 -88%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *107.279.3 26%120.3 -12%117.7 -10%156.6 -46%196.8 -84%Load Maximum *143.7145.2 -1%138.1 4%142 1%167.5 -17%212.6 -48%250 -74%173.8 -21%138.5 4%Witcher 3 ultra *109159.6126.4* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø117.7 (106.3-143.7) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.28 (7.11-8.05) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø116.2 (111.7-119.1)
Power consumption with external monitor
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø20.2 (18.8-22.5) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø98.3 (95.5-100.8) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.98 (5.75-6.7) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø107.2 (102.8-111.8) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cinebench 2024 Multi Power (external Monitor): Ø92.2 (85.6-105.4) Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max; Cinebench 2024 Single Power (external Monitor): Ø21.6 (19.9-23.2)
运行时间它的电池续航时间比 M3 Max 的前身但 M4 Pro 的续航时间更长。在 WLAN 测试中，M4 Pro 的运行时间为 18 小时，在视频测试中略低于 22 小时（均为 150 cd/m²），而 Windows 系统的直接竞争对手则毫无胜算。 戴尔 XPS 16 9640和 华硕 ProArt P16只有戴尔 XPS 16 9640 和华硕 ProArt P16 在视频测试中表现出色。
在全 SDR 亮度的 WLAN 测试中，它的运行时间仍为 6:45 小时，考虑到其明亮的面板，这样的表现还算不错。不过，在满载情况下，你需要付出笔记本电脑性能没有节流的代价。在最糟糕的情况下，测试在 65 分钟后结束，其中低电量模式在 56 分钟后启动。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 58min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 05min
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxM4 Max (16 cores), M4 Max 40-Core GPU, 99.6 WhApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 99.6 WhApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, 99.6 WhHP ZBook Studio 16 G11Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 86 WhLenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEUltra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 WhAsus ProArt P16 H7606WIRyzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 WhSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 WhLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 84 WhDell XPS 16 9640Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 WhAverage of class Multimedia Battery Runtime-1%11%-73%15%7%-69%-29%-11%-2%H.26413051221 -6%1474 13%1260 -3%692 -47%988 -24%954 ?(498 - 1481, n=38, last 2 years) -27%WiFi v1.31078999 -7%1178 9%290 -73%595 -45%499 -54%337 -69%526 -51%629 -42%694 ?(262 - 1204, n=67, last 2 years) -36%Load6571 9%114 75%116 78%73 12%87 34%102.2 ?(50 - 209, n=42, last 2 years) 57%
Notebookcheck 总评分新的Apple M4 Max 给我们留下了深刻印象，其性能明显提高，特别是它的处理器在许多方面都是市场上最快的机型之一。目前在单核范围内还没有更快的 CPU，但即使在多核范围内，你也必须使用 酷睿 i9-14900HX或台式机 CPU 才能获得更高的性能。不过，它的功耗也会随着性能的提升而增加，MacBook Pro 16 的散热无法完全发挥全新 M4 Max 的潜力，尤其是在综合负载的情况下。尽管如此，即使配备了 M4 Max，MacBook Pro 16 仍是市场上最好的多媒体笔记本电脑之一。
Back to the verdict
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
- 12/08/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard92%
Pointing Device100%
Connectivity79 / 80 → 99%
Weight62 / 20-74 → 78%
Battery91 / 95 → 96%
Display91%
Games Performance85 / 88 → 97%
Application Performance94 / 92 → 100%
Temperature89%
Noise76 / 95 → 80%
Audio93%
Camera38 / 75 → 51%
Average74%
92%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions56.1%Materials50%Packaging100%Power Use86.2%Repairability0%Software Updates50% Total Sustainability Score: 57.1%
More articles related to this deviceApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max (MacBook Pro 16 2024 Series)News•适用于 MacBook Pro 的全新 Fonecyc MegaHub 底座可增加高达 16TB 的固态硬盘存储空间 |News•Apple配备 M4 Max 的 MacBook Pro 16 是最适合视频剪辑的笔记本电脑 |Review•Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 评测：超长电池使用时间，性能更胜 M4 Pro
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 459 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 578570 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!